Disposed

Lingamuthu v. State Rep by

Madras HC24 Sept 2020CRL OP/15006/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directs the police to issue a notice to the petitioners under Section 41A CrPC for recording statements. The petitioner is directed to appear, and the investigation must conclude by 22.10.2020. If arrest is proposed, reasons must be given, allowing the petitioner to apply for anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Direction to police to record statements under Section 41A CrPC and conclude inquiry by 22.10.2020; police to state reasons in writing if arrest is proposed.

Lingamuthu Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 24.09.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.15006 of 2020

¶6

1.Lingamuthu ... Petitioners
2.Sivalingam
3.Sumathi
Vs.
The State represented by ...Respondent
The Inspector of Police,
T-14, Mangadu Police Station
Mangadu
Kanchipuram District
Crime No.Not known/2020)
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of
Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioner on
Anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.not known
of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.

¶7

For Petitioners : Mr. Madhusudanan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶8

The Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petition enquiry against the petitioner is pending in CSR No.1216 of 2020 on the complaint of one Varsha.

¶9

The respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C to the petitioners. The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein. The Investigating Officer is to either register a First Information Report or close the complaint by 22.10.2020. If the Investigating Officer has grounds to arrest the petitioners, then he has to state the reasons in writing and communicate the same to the petitioners and in that case, the petitioners are at liberty to file necessary application before this Court seeking anticipatory bail.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is
closed
-sd/-
24/09/2020
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
T-14, MANGADU POLICE STATION,
KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.MADHUSUDANAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.15006/2020
Date :24/09/2020
TA-30/09/2020

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Lingamuthu v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lingamuthu v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabu Vs State by

Sundaramoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Balasubramaniyan Vs the State Rep by

Sankar Vs State by

C.Ganeshan Vs Iop Ch

Bhakkiyaraj Vs the State Rep. by