Prabu v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner arrested under the TNP Act for illegal possession of arrack. The court imposed conditions to donate Rs.25,000 to a charitable trust, execute a bond, and report periodically.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted subject to payment of Rs.25,000 to a charitable trust, execution of bail bond, and reporting conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.14897 of 2020
Prabhu ... Petitioner/Accused
Vs. The State represented by, ... Respondent/Complainant The Inspector of Police, Veppamkuppam Police Station, Anaicut Taluk, Vellore District. Crime No. 751 of 2020.
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No. 751 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Arthi For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the present case.
What conditions should be imposed on the grant of bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prabhu
- respondent
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Veppamkuppam Police Station
Coram
A.D.Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court