Narasimman v. the State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras extended the time granted in a prior order for the petitioners to execute surety, considering their inability to do so due to being affected by COVID-19.
What did the court decide?
Time is extended for a period of three weeks to execute surety.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 22.09.2020
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.M.P.No.5618 of 2020
in
Crl.O.P.No.9380 of 2020
- Narasimman
- Venkatesan
- Ramalingam ... Petitioners
Vs.
The State,
Rep by the Station House Officer, R.K. Pet Police Station,
R.K. Pet Taluk, Thiruvallur District. ... Respondent Tamil Nadu, ( Cr.No.1339 of 2020)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be extended for the petitioner to execute surety due to COVID-19 affected status.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Narasimman
- petitioner
Venkatesan
- petitioner
Ramalingam
- respondent
The State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court