Disposed

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. v. the Tamil Nadu State Rep by

Madras HC5 Feb 2020CRL OP/14211/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an MPS under CrPC 482, the petitioners sought to expedite a criminal trial pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur, and dispense with their personal appearance. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial, dispensed with physical appearance except for receipt of copies and statutory readings, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed trial court to expedite trial; dispensed with petitioners' presence except for statutory proceedings.

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. Vs the Tamil Nadu… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.02.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.14211 of 2013

¶5

1.M/s.Preet Remedies Private Limited,

¶6

184, HPSIDC Industrial Area Baddi 173 205 Himachal Pradesh rep.by Harpreet Singh Kalra, Director of the Company.

¶7

2.Harpreet Singh Kalra Director of the Company, M/s.Preet Remedies Private Limited,

¶8

184, HPSIDC Industrial Area, Baddi 173 205, Himachal Pradesh. ... Petitioners Vs.

¶9

The Tamil Nadu State rep.by

¶10

P. Panneerselvam,

¶11

Drug Inspector, Thiruvottiyur Range Office of the Assistant Director of Drugs

¶12

Control, Thiruvallur Zone, 201 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Thiruvallur 602 001.

¶13

... Respondent

¶14

Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to call for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.77/2009 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur and quash the same.

¶15

For Petitioners : M/s.V. Babu For Respondent : Mr.C. Iyyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in C.C.No.77 of 2009 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur and to quash the same.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the Trial Court to

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

expedite the trial and complete the same as early as possible. He would further submit that the appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court may be dispensed with and would further submit that the petitioners are ready to appear as and when necessary arise.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent concede to the request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶22

In view of the above, this Court directs the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur, to expedite the trial in C.C.No.77 of 2009 and complete the same as early as possible. The appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court is dispensed with. However, this order will not stand on the way of the Trial Court to insist for the appearance of the petitioners for receiving copies under Section 207 of Cr.P.C., framing of charges, questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and judgment and as and when the Trial Court feels it necessary.

¶23

With the above directions, this criminal original
petition is disposed of. Connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(I)
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
AT
To
1.The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras, Chennai - 600 104.
+1cc to Mr.Venkatasamy Babu, Advocate, SR.No.9633.
Crl.O.P.No.14211 of 2013
MG(CO)
CSR: 06.03.2020

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. v. the Tamil Nadu State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. v. the Tamil Nadu State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Mahalingam Vs Sri Radhakrishnan Sizin Mills

K.M.Noorjahan Vs the State Rep by

Mary Priyadarshini Samuel, Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by

S.Harinatha Reddy Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Manimozhi Vs Mr.K.T.Thambi Arasu

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. Vs the Drug Inspsector