Disposed

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. v. the Drug Inspsector

Madras HC5 Feb 2020CRL OP/13083/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court, deciding a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., directed the lower court to expedite the trial of C.C.No.271/2009 and complete it early. The petitioners' appearance was dispensed with, subject to mandatory court proceedings under Sections 207 and 313 Cr.P.C. The petition was then disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directions to expedite trial and dispense with petitioner's appearance, subject to mandatory court appearances under Sections 207 and 313 Cr.P.C.

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. Vs the Drug… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.02.2020

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

Crl.O.P.No.13083 of 2013

¶5

1.M/s.Preet Remedies Private Limited,

¶6

Plot No.184, HPSIDC Industrial Area

Baddi (H.P.)

rep.by its Director

H.S. Kalra

184, HPSIDC, Industrial Area

¶11

Baddi 173 205, Himachal Pradesh.

¶12

2.H.S. Kalra

¶13

Director of M/s.Preet Remedies Private Limited, Baddi. ... Petitioners

¶14

Vs.

¶15

The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by Drug Inspector,

¶16

Park Town-I Range

¶17

Office of the Assistant Director of Drugs Control, Zone-I, Chennai – 6. ... Respondent

¶18

Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to call for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.271/2009 pending on the file of XV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai and quash the same.

¶19

For Petitioners : M/s.V. Babu For Respondent : Mr.C. Iyyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶20

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in C.C.No.271 of 2009 on the file of the learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai and to quash the same.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial and complete the same as early as possible. He would further submit that the appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court may be dispensed with and would further

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

submit that the petitioners are ready to appear as and when necessary arise.

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent concede to the request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶25

In view of the above, this Court directs the Learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai, to expedite the trial in C.C.No.271 of 2009 and complete the same as early as possible. The appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court is dispensed with. However, this order will not stand on the way of the Trial Court to insist for the appearance of the petitioners for receiving copies under Section 207 of Cr.P.C., framing of charges, questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and judgment and as and when the Trial Court feels it necessary.

¶26

With the above directions, this criminal original
petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(I)
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
AT
To
1.The XV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town,
Chennai.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras,
Chennai - 600 104.
+1cc to Mr.Venkatasamy, Advocate, SR.No.9635.
Crl.O.P.No.13083 of 2013
MG(CO)
CSR: 05.03.2020

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. v. the Drug Inspsector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. v. the Drug Inspsector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Mahalingam Vs Sri Radhakrishnan Sizin Mills

K.M.Noorjahan Vs the State Rep by

Mary Priyadarshini Samuel, Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by

S.Harinatha Reddy Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Manimozhi Vs Mr.K.T.Thambi Arasu

M/S.Preet Remedies Private Ltd. Vs the Tamil Nadu State Rep by