Allowed

Bakiyaraj v. State by

Madras HC31 Aug 2020CRL OP/13270/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a sand transportation case. The court included a condition requiring the petitioner to donate Rs.45,000 to a charitable organization and imposed standard bail conditions including reporting and non-absconding.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on condition of payment of Rs.45,000 to a charity, execution of bond with sureties, and adherence to reporting and non-absconding conditions.

Bakiyaraj Vs State by — Mining and Natural Resources | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 31.08.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.13270 of 2020

¶6

Bakiyaraj

¶7

Vs. The State Rep by its ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, Vandavasi South Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District, Crime No.1723 of 2020

¶8

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 1723 of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R. Thamarai Selvan

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.M. Mohammed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

ORDER

¶12

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶13

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 430 of I.P.C. and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act 1957, in Crime No. 1723 of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 3 units of river sand through lorry without obtaining proper license. Hence, the complaint.

¶15

3 . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and they have been falsely implicated in this case. On instruction, he would further submit that taking into consideration the present Covid pandemic situation the petitioner is prepared to donate/pay some considerable amount to any charitable organization or association without prejudice to his defence and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the quantity of river sand involved is 3 units. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous case. However, he opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶18

In order to curb the illegal sand mining activities and taking into consideration the voluntary submission made by the petitioner offering to donate/pay considerable amount to any charitable organization or association, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may be directed to donate/pay a sum of Rs.45,000/- (Rupees Forty Five Thousand only) each, to Little Drops, A/c. No.05811010002400, IFSC.No.ORBC0100581, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Moulivakkam, Chennai, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

¶19

Merely, because the petitioner deposit the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶20

7.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions :

¶21

[a] The petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.45,000/(Rupees Forty Five Thousand only) each, either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of Little Drops, A/c. No.05811010002400, IFSC.No.ORBC0100581, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Moulivakkam, Chennai, within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance and on production of proof of payment of the above amount and on further condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the police officer who intends to arrest, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed automatically and on further condition that the petitioner shall also give a letter of undertaking before the respondent/police that the said amount has been paid in respect of particular crime number.

¶22

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the respondent/police may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶23

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every Monday and Friday at 10.30 am until further orders.

¶24

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶27

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶28

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶29

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. -sd/31/08/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POLUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANDAVASI SOUTH POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. 5 THE LITTLE DROPS, A/C. NO.05811010002400, IFSC.NO.ORBC0100581, ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE, MOULIVAKKAM, CHENNAI, CC to M/S. R.THAMARAI SELVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.13270/2020 Date :31/08/2020

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TA-22/09/2020

Bakiyaraj v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bakiyaraj v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Ranjithkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Illamalli Sagadevan Vs State Represented by

Chinnaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Suresh Vs State Rep by

Awel Muktor Shifa Vs State Rep. by Its

K.Muthu Vs State Rep.by