Disposed

P.Sivagami v. State Rep. by

Madras HC19 Aug 2020CRL OP/12583/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking non-harassment regarding a civil property dispute pending before the Revenue Divisional Officer was closed, with a direction to cooperate in any pending Section 107 enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; direction to cooperate for enquiry under Section 107 Cr.P.C. if summons issued by Revenue Divisional Officer.

P.Sivagami Vs State Rep. by — Madras HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 19.08.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

Crl.OP.No.12583 of 2020

¶6

1.P.Sivagami
2.K.Periyasami
3.P.Sundararajan ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. State Rep. by
The Superintendent of Police
O/o. the Namakkal District Superintendent of Police,
Nallipalayam, Namakkal Taluk,
Namakkal District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
O/o.the Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Rasipuram, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Rasipuram Police Station,
Rasipuram Town & Taluk,
Namakkal District. ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer :- The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the third respondent not to harass the petitioners in relation to the petition given by Dhanalakshmi to the third respondent in connection with the property of the petitioner and dispose of the said petition in accordance with law.

¶8

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Kalyanaraman For Respondents : Mr.S.Karthikeyan

¶9

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

ORDER

¶11

The petition has been filed for directing the third respondent not to harass the petitioners in relation to the petition given by one Dhanalakshmi.

¶12

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the complaint lodged by Dhanalakshmi, she was issued C.S.R.No.19 of 2020, enquiry was conducted and the same was closed. She further submitted that the issue between both the

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

parties have been referred before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal, for initiation of proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C. and the same is pending.

¶15

Recording the above submission, the petition is closed. No costs. However, if the summons issued from the Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal, for initiation of proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C., the petitioner is directed to cooperate for the enquiry.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

¶21

The Superintendent of Police O/o. the Namakkal District Superintendent of Police, Nallipalayam, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶22

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rasipuram Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶23

The Inspector of Police, Rasipuram Police Station, Rasipuram Town & Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶24

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras-104.

¶25

+1 cc to Mr.S.Kalyanaraman, Advocate Sr.No.27251

¶26

Crl.OP.No.12583 of 2020

¶27

nrl (co) rr ii (09/09/2020)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Sivagami v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Sivagami v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Suguna Vs P.Senthilnathan

Ranganathan Vs the State Represented by

Bank of Maharashtra Vs the Inspector Ofpolice

Mohan Vs State Rep by

Edwin Vs The Inspector of Police

Sahul Hammed Vs The Inspector of Police