Dismissed

Ayyanar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Jun 2020CRL MP(MD)/3299/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition under Section 439(1)b of Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought relaxation of a court-ordered maintenance condition imposed during anticipatory bail proceedings. The court dismissed the petition, holding that the time of granting anticipatory bail was the appropriate time to impose such conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petition for relaxation of maintenance condition imposed during anticipatory bail proceedings dismissed.

Ayyanar Vs The Inspector of Police — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL MP(MD). No.3299 of 2020 in

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 19/06/2020 PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL MP(MD). No.3299 of 2020 in CRL OP(MD). No.18551 of 2019 AYYANAR ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶6

VS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR.NO.8 OF 2019. ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.A.George Stephen Kanikkair,

¶8

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶9

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.439(1)b of Cr.P.C

¶10

PRAYER :-

¶11

To relax the condition imposed as per the order dated 11/12/2019 regarding the monthly payment of maintenance amount of Rs.3000/- to the de-facto complainant in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18551 of 2019 and thus render justice.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in CRL.OP(MD)No.18551 of 2019.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this Court has no power to order for maintenance while dealing with anticipatory bail. Hence, the learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for relaxation of condition imposed by this Court while dealing with anticipatory bail.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

CRL MP(MD). No.3299 of 2020 in

¶18

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, while exercising the discretionary power to grant anticipatory bail, has rightly imposed the condition that the petitioner should pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as maintenance in favour of his wife. Hence, this Court has no reason to entertain this petition.

¶19

4.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

¶20

/ TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶23

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶24

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶25

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

CMR

¶27

JM/PN/SAR 2/23.06.2020/2P/5C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

2/2

Ayyanar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayyanar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayyanar Vs The Inspector of Police

N.Ashok Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Mariyasusai Vs the Inspector of Police

Prakash Vs The Inspector of Police

Thangapandian Vs The Assistant commissioner of Police

Anbu Ganesh Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police