Disposed

Chinnathambi v. Deivam

Madras HC3 Nov 2020CONT P(MD)/790/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a previous order to remove the petitioner's name from a History Sheet, the High Court, satisfied by the Government Advocate's undertaking that the review would be completed by December 2020, closed the petition without any punishment.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was closed after recording the submission and undertaking of the learned Government Advocate.

Chinnathambi Vs Deivam — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CONT.P.(MD)No.790 of 2020 IN

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.11.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CONT.P.(MD)No.790 of 2020 IN W.P.(MD)No.25980 of 2019

¶7

Chinnathambi ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Deivam, Inspector of Police Station, Taluk Police Station, Round Road, Dindigul. ... Contemnor/4^th Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor/respondent for willfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court dated 05.12.2019 in W.P.(MD)No.25980 of 2019.

¶11

Prayer in WP(MD). 25980/ 2019 :

¶12

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the petitioners name from the History Sheet No.31/2015 maintained by the 4th Respondent within the period that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Samy

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson,

¶15

Government Advocate.(Crl.Side)

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The petitioner's counsel alleges non-compliance of the direction given by this Court. Hence, this contempt petition has been filed.

¶18

The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) states that the review regarding the status of history sheeter will be done in the month of December. He gives an undertaking that by December 2020, the process of review would be completed.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

CONT.P.(MD)No.790 of 2020 IN

¶22

Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), this contempt petition stands closed.

¶23

Assistant Registrar (AD-II)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

Skm

¶27

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶28

To :

¶29

Inspector of Police Station, Taluk Police Station, Round Road, Dindigul.

¶30

CONT.P.(MD)No.790 of 2020 IN W.P.(MD)No.25980 of 2019

¶31

03.11.2020

¶32

ARK (CO)

¶33

NR (11/12/2020) 2P : 2C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Chinnathambi v. Deivam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinnathambi v. Deivam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthurakku Vs M.Pallavii Bal Dev

M.Selvakumar Vs the District Collector

P.Srinivasan Vs The Inspector of Police

Manjula Arsupillai Vs The Inspector of Police

R.Kaviyam Vs the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings

Karpagam Vs The Inspector of Police