Disposed

Muthurakku v. M.Pallavii Bal Dev

Madras HC2 Nov 2020CONT P(MD)/275/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a contempt petition for willful disobedience of an order directing survey of land. The High Court closed the contempt petition, holding that due to local opposition difficulties, the petitioner must approach the Civil Court for relief.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed; liberty granted to petitioner to approach Civil Court for appropriate relief.

Muthurakku Vs M.Pallavii Bal Dev — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Cont. P(MD)No.275 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.11.2020 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.275 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)No.7988 of 2019

Muthurakku

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.M.Pallavi Bal Dev, District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

¶8

2.Manimaran, Thasildhar, Bodinayakkanur, Theni.

¶9

3.Nithayandam, Surveyor, Bodinayakkanur, Theni District. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 30.04.2019 in W.P.(MD) No.7988 of 2019.

¶11

Prayer in WP(MD). 7988/ 2019 :

¶12

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to survey the petitioners land in survey 80/1B, 80/3B and 81/6B situated at Kodangipatti, Kodangipatti Post, Bodinayakkanur Taluk, Theni District and fix its boundaries as per the revenue records within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This Contempt petition has been filed alleging breach of directions given by this Court in the main writ petition.

¶16

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents states that the direction was given for conducting survey exercise. But then, due to local opposition, there are some https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

Cont. P(MD)No.275 of 2020

¶19

difficulties in carrying out the survey. Therefore, the petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional Civil Court for appropriate relief.

¶20

3.With this liberty to the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar (T&P)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

das

¶26

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

¶28

1.M.Pallavi Bal Dev, District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

¶29

2.Manimaran, Thasildhar, Bodinayakkanur, Theni.

¶30

3.Nithayandam, Surveyor, Bodinayakkanur, Theni District.

¶31

+1 CC to the SPL GP ( SR-21001[F] dated 03/11/2020 )

¶32

Cont. P(MD)No.275 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)No.7988 of 2019 02.11.2020

¶33

NS(CO) CS(08.12.2020) 2P 5C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

1/2

Muthurakku v. M.Pallavii Bal Dev

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthurakku v. M.Pallavii Bal Dev

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthu Vs The Inspector of Police

P. Manikandan Vs The Sub-Inspector of Police

V.Seenivasan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

M.Selvakumar Vs the District Collector

P.Srinivasan Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajeswari Vs The Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption