Vasuki v. Manoharan
Case brief
What is this about?
This petrol officer contended that inadvertent misinformation led to the filing of a contempt petition against the respondent police officer. The Court accepted the apology and closed the petition without punishment.
What the court decided
CONT. P.(MD).No.34 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.02.2020 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CONT. P.(MD).No.34 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15239 of 2019
Vasuki ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs. Mr.Manoharan, Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukottai District. ...Contemnor/2nd Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/respondent for his willful disobedience in the order of this Court passed in Crl.O.P. (MD).No.15239 of 2019 dated 24.10.2019.
Prayer in Crl.OP(MD)No.15239 of 2019
Criminal Original Petition is filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying this Hon'ble to direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Cr.No.36/2019 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Balakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.S.Chandrasekar, Additional Public Prosecutor
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vasuki
- respondent
Mr.Manoharan
Coram
A.D.Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court