K.Kandasamy v. Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition challenging non-compliance with a 2019 order revising pension, the court held that no contempt proceedings lie for unpaid leave salary commutation and gratuity as the original order directed neither. The petition is closed.
What did the court decide?
No relief; petition closed as no positive direction existed for the alleged unpaid amounts.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P(MD)No.1795 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN Cont P(MD)No.1795 of 2019
K.Kandasamy ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.Murugesan Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn(MDU) ltd., By pass road, Madurai.
2.Mr.Venkatraj,
Finance Advisor and Chief Accounts Officer, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn (MDU) Ltd., By Pass Road, Madurai.
3.Venkatraj, Administrator, TNSTC Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, SETC Complex, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.
4.Mr.Rajeshwaran, General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn (MDU) Ltd., Dindigul Region, By Pass Road, Dindigul (Post), Dindigul District. ... Contemnors/Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings can be maintained for non-payment of leave salary commutation and gratuity when the earlier order did not direct such payment.
Whether the respondents have willfully disobeyed the court order dated 10.01.2019 regarding pension benefits and arrears.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Kandasamy
- respondent
Mr.Murugesan
- respondent
Mr.Venkatraj
- respondent
Venkatraj
- respondent
Mr.Rajeshwaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court