This second appeal challenging a property partition decree and lower appeals was dismissed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, upholding the Subordinate Judge's confirmation of the Divisional Court's decree.
Second appeal dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the Seventh day of January Two Thousand and Twenty PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN SA(MD). No.506 of 2015
MUTHULAKSHMI,
... Appellant / Appellant / Plaintiff Vs
2 MURUGESAN
8 RAJESWARI
9 INDIRA ... Respondents / Respondents / Defendants
Prayer:-
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur, in A.S. No.26 of 2011, dated 17.06.2015, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No.449 of 2004, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur dated 06.12.2010.
DECREE:-
This Second Appeal coming upon for hearing under the provisions of Rule II of Order XLI of Schedule I of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal and the judgments and decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and upon hearing the arguments of MR.G.JEYAPRAKASH, Advocate for the Appellant, Mr.M.THIRUNAVUKKARASU for MR.V.B.SUNDARESHWAR, it is ordered and decreed that this Second Appeal be and hereby is dismissed and that there be no costs.
Schedule of Property
fNzrd; tPl;Lf;F fpof;F> fhspKj;J tPl;Lf;F Nkw;F> rptfhkpehjd; tPl;Lf;F njw;F. M.rptfhkp ehjd; tPl;Lf;Fk; njw;F> fpoNky; njUTf;Fk; tlf;F> ,jw;Ff; fpoNky; mb 22.1/ 2> njd;tly; mb 38 cs;s kidAk;> mjpy; 30 rJu kPl;lh; msTs;s kz; Rth; Xl;lLf;F tL> fjT> epiy> Nkw;Nfhg;G tifawhTk;. Nlhh; eph; 43-2gp ej;jk; 68v-3 eph; Mfk;.
thjp kjpg;G &.40>000.00
,jw;Fs; fpoNky; mb 40.1/ 2> njd;tly; mb 13.1/ 2> cs;s nfhy;iy kid> ej;jk; rh;Nt 68V- 3 eph;> thjp kjpg;G &.1000.00
tPl;Lf;Fk;> nghJ eilghijf;Fk; fpof;F. Rptfhkp ehjd; tifawh fhyp kidf;Fk;> 4 mb mfy nghJ eilghijf;Fk;-Nkw;F.
,jw;Fs; njd;gf;fk; fpoNky; mb 18.1/ 2> njd;tly; mb 37.1/ 2 cs;s kidAk; mjpy; 18 rJu kPl;lh; mstpy; fl;bapUf;Fk; fhiu kl;lg;gh tL> fjT epiy> Nkw;Nfhg;G> vyf;l;hpf; tifawhTk;> Nkw;gb khYf;Fs; tlgf;fk; fpoNky; mb 18.1/ 2> njd;tly; mb 49 cs;s kidAk;> mjpy; 30 rJu kPl;lh; mstpy; fl;bapUf;Fk; kz Rth; Xl;lLf;F nfhl;lif> fjT epiy> Nkw;Nfhg;G> tifawhTk;> Nlhh; eph; 24V> -2gp ej;jk; rh;Nt 68V- 3 eph;. thjp kjpg;G &.1>00>000.00
,jw;Fs; fpoNky; mb 18.1/ 2> njd;tly; mb 15 cs;s fhypkidAk; ej;jk; rh;Nt 68V-3 eph;.
,jw;Fs; fpoNky; mb 18.1/ 2> njd;tly; mb 20 cs;s fhypkidAk; ej;jk; rh;Nt 68-3. thjp kjpg;G &.10>000.00
,jw;Fs; fpoNky; mb 23.1/2> njd;tly; mb 19.1/2> cs;s kidAk>; mjpy; 15 rJu kPl;lh; mstpy; fl;bapUf;Fk; kz; Rth;> jfuk; Nghl;l tPL> fjT> epiy> Nkw;Nfhg;G tifawhTk;> Nlhh; eph; 34-2gp> ej;jk; rh;Nt 68V-3 eph;. thjp kjpg;G &.15>000.00
thjpapd; jPh;it kjpg;G &.17-10.
Sd/-
// True Copy //
To 1) The Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur 2) The Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur. Copy to: The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 2 Copies +1 cc to M/s.V.B.SUNDARESHWAR, Advocate in SR 635 ORDER DATED:07/01/2020 ========================= =
D E C R E E ========================= SA(MD). No.506 of 2015
| Nature of Decree:- |
|---|
| Dismissing the Second |
| Appeal preferred against |
| the judgment and decree |
| of the Subordinate Judge, |
| Srivilliputhur in |
| A.S.No.26 of 2011 dated |
| 17.06.2015, confirming |
| the Judgment and Decree |
| in O.S. No.449 of 2004 on |
| the file of the Prl. |
| District Munsif, |
| Srivilliputhur dated |
| 06.12.2010 etc., as |
| stated within. |
SMA/13/02/2020/3P/6C
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the second appeal under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment of the Subordinate Judge was maintainable and prejudicial.
Whether the lower appellate court correctly confirmed the decree in the original suit regarding property partition and division of shares.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
MUTHULAKSHMI
S.BACKIALAKSHMI
MURUGESAN
RAMASUBRAMANIAN
GURUNATHAN MANI
YOGARAJ
R.SUBRAMANIAN
SA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
