Disposed

M/S.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. the Chief Revenue Control Authority

Madras HC5 Nov 2020CMA/1186/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against an order confirming undervaluation of stamp duty. Court records respondent's admission that the document is in order and directs immediate release of the registered sale deed to the appellant.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Sub-Registrar to release the original sale deed to the appellant within one week.

M/S.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs the Chief Revenue… — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.11.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

¶5

CMA.NO.1186 OF 2020 AND

¶6

CMP.NOs.7402 and 7403 of 2020

¶7

M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, No.1, Ranganathan Gardens, Off.:11th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040.

¶8

... Appellant

¶9

-vs-

¶10

The Chief Revenue Control Authority and Inspector General of Registration,

¶11

No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028.

¶12

2.The District Revenue Inspector (Stamps),

¶13

District Collector Office, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.

¶14

3.The Sub-Registrar,

¶15

Sub-Registrar Office, Central Madras,

¶16

Chennai. ... Respondents

¶17

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed against the order of the 1st respondent in Ref.No.Na.Ka.579215/N1/2017 dated 24.2.2020 confirming the order of the Deputy Collector (Stamps) dated 23.9.2003 made in Ref.Na.Ka.C.Pa.No.97/99 dated 23.9.2003 dismissing the stamp appeal filed by the appellant Corporation.

¶18

For Appellant : Mr.O.R.Santhana Krishnan

¶19

For Respondents: Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Spl.G.P.

¶20

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been directed against the impugned order dated 24.02.2020 passed by the Chief Revenue Control Authority and the Inspector General of Registration, thereby confirming the order of the Deputy Collector (Stamps) dated 23.9.2003 made in Ref.Na.Ka.C.Pa.No.97/99 dated 23.9.2003 dismissing the stamp appeal filed by the appellant Corporation.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the appellant Corporation has purchased a property admeasuring to an extent of 5,976 sq.ft. vacant land from one D.M.Rajan for a sale consideration of Rs.71,71,200/-. A sale deed was drawn on stamp papers for the value of Rs.9,32,256/calculated at 13% of the sale price as applicable and the appellant presented the same for registration before the SubRegistrar of Central Madras on 20.01.1997 with a requisite Registration Fee of Rs.71,745/-. The Sub-Registrar registered the sale deed by allotting P.No.8/97 and the sale consideration of Rs.71,71,200/- was duly ratified by the appropriate authority stating that there is no objection for transfer of the property in favour of M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and the said document was also re-numbered as 569/1999. Thereafter, when the appellant approached the Sub-Registrar Office, Central Madras, to get back the original sale deed, the Sub-Registrar refused to release the same, instead, the appellant Corporation was directed to pay additional stamp duty of Rs.1,16,532/- to get back the original instrument, failing which, the matter would be referred to the Deputy Collector (Stamps) for undervaluation of stamps.

¶23

Learned Counsel for the appellant further submitted that finally, the matter was referred to the Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), Chennai under Section 47-A(1) read with Rules 4 to 6 of the Tamil Nadu Stamps (Prevention of UnderValuation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 for proper adjudication. Thereafter, the appellant was served with notice in Form No.1 under Rule 4 of the Rules for immediate payment of the deficit payment or else file objections within 21 days of such notice with supporting documents. The appellant Corporation made oral representations during the enquiry proceedings and finally, an order dated 23.09.2003 was passed by the District Revenue Inspector (Stamps), Chennai stating that the property-inquestion is under valued to the extent of Rs.1,16,532/- and called upon the appellant to pay the said sum within two months, failing which interest at 2% will be levied. Aggrieved by the same, when appeal was filed before the Chief Revenue Control Authority and Inspector General of Registration, the 1st respondent herein on 01.12.2003, it was rejected on the ground of delay that it has not been filed within 60 days time from the date of the order instead of appreciating the fact that 60 days can be calculated only from the date of receipt of the order by the appellant Corporation. Therefore, when W.P.No.12171/2004 was filed, by order dated 13.09.2017, this Court while allowing the said writ petition, directed the 1st respondent to take up the appeal and decide the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order on merits. Finally, the present impugned order has been passed on 24.02.2020 fixing Rs.1200/- as a guideline value per square feet for the property-

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

in-question payable by the appellant. Hence the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

¶26

Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the order impugned is literally a speaking order passed only in favour of the appellant. Further, when the 1st respondent appellate authority has accepted the case of the appellant that they are liable to pay Rs.1200/- per square feet on the basis of the prevailing guideline value, there is no need for the appellant to approach this Court filing this appeal instead, they should have approached the SubRegistrar concerned to receive the document and the respondents have no objection for releasing the document within a time fixed by this Court.

¶27

Recording the statement now made by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the respondents are ready to release the document registered by the appellant on 20.01.1997, this Court hereby directs the 3rd respondent herein, namely, the Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Central Madras, Chennai-18 to release the said documentin-question to the appellant Corporation, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶28

6 . With the above direction, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsi To 1. The Chief Revenue Control Authority and Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028. 2.The District Revenue Inspector (Stamps), District Collector Office, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. 3.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Central Madras, Chennai.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

CMA.No.1186/2020

¶31

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.36319

¶32

MG(CO) CB(15/03/2021)

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. the Chief Revenue Control Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. the Chief Revenue Control Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.N.Ramanarayanan Vs R.Abinaya

Sagana Vs Shri Ram

E.Komala Vs K.Arunprasad

Anandakumar Vs Sivasankari

S.Padmini Vs S.Arumuga Nainar

K.Gomathi Vs G.Ganesh