P Rajendiran v. Mohan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged non-payment of pension benefits via a contempt petition. Court held benefits were fully paid; petition closed with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; liberty to approach appropriate forum if further grievance exists.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.688 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 14.10.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition No.688 of 2020
P.Rajendiran .. Petitioner
Versus
1.Mohan,
The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Salem) Limited,
No.12, Ramakrishna Road,
Salem-7.
2.Durairaj,
The Administrator,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme,
Thiruvalluvar House,
Pallavan Salai,
Chennai – 600 002. .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to
punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court
in W.P. No.26959 of 2017 dated 20.10.2017.
Contempt Petition No.688 of 2020
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Desinghu For Respondents : Mr.K.Thangan for Mr.D.Raghu for R1
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Rajendiran
- respondent
Mohan
- respondent
Durairaj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court