N.Sulaiman v. Satheesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Defendant-side submission that rent deduction order was complied with and proposal approved led to the closure of this contempt petition without separate reasoning.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition No.499 of 2020 stands closed.
What the court decided
Contempt Petition No.499 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 14.10.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition No.499 of 2020
N.Sulaiman .. Petitioner
Versus
1.Satheesh,
The Commissioner,
Salem Corporation,
Salem.
2.Selvaraj,
The Assistant Commissioner,
Suramangalam Ward Office,
Salem Corporation,
Salem. .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the orders passed in W.P. No.22855 of 2016 dated 15.10.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents : Mr.A.Kumar, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.S.Sathish, Standing Counsel
Contempt Petition No.499 of 2020
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Sulaiman
- respondent
Satheesh
- respondent
Selvaraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court