Disposed

V.Parimala v. Lakshmi Rajaram

Madras HC28 Oct 2020CONT P/513/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court heard a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 alleging willful disobedience of a prior order. The respondent apologized for an inadvertent termination, paid the petitioner's salary, and requested leave to close the petition. The court recorded the submission and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition was closed on the merit of the respondent's unconditional apology and payment of salary.

V.Parimala Vs Lakshmi Rajaram — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Contempt Petition No.513 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED 28.10.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

¶6

Contempt Petition No.513 of 2020
V.Parimala .. Petitioner
Versus
Lakshmi Rajaram,
The Secretary,
Dr.Mangalam Higher Secondary School,
Sivananda Saraswathi Sewasraman,
Kattankolathur,
Kancheepuram District. .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to
enquire and punish the respondent for her willful disobedience of the order of this
Court dated 08.03.2018 made in W.M.P. No.6462 of 2018 in W.P. No.5265 of
2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Umashankar
For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramesh for
Mr.C.Rukmani

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

Contempt Petition No.513 of 2020

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

Mr.B.Ramesh, learned counsel for the respondent, placing an un-conditional

¶11

apology for having wrongly passed the order of termination dated 28.02.2020, pleaded that the said order has been inadvertently passed. However, withdrawing the same now the petitioner has been disbursed with the salary and that respondents 1 and 2 in the writ petition namely, the Education Department are liable to pay the arrears for the period from March to September 2020 and in this regard, a request letter has also been sent to them for payment of arrears of salary. Since this Court has been safeguarding the interest of all concerned who are giving education to the Society and that the Secretary of the School has never intended to disobey the order of this Court as they are all the time giving unlimited regard and respect to the Court and that the petitioner's salary has been paid and that recommendation has also been sent to respondents 1 and 2 in the writ petition for payment of arrears from March to September 2020, the inadvertent mistake may be condoned and this contempt petition may be closed.

¶12

2.Mr.C.Umashankar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, agreeing

¶13

with the above submission with regard to the payment of salary and also writing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ letter to respondents 1 and 2 in the writ petition requesting them to release the

¶14

Contempt Petition No.513 of 2020

¶15

arrears of salary for the period from March to September, requested this Court to close the Contempt Petition.

¶16

3.Recording the submission made by both sides, placing the counter

¶17

affidavit filed by the respondent stating unconditional apology, the Contempt

¶18

Petition stands closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
vga
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the
Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SMI/30/12/2020

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Parimala v. Lakshmi Rajaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Parimala v. Lakshmi Rajaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meena Thiyagarajan Vs M.K. Arvind Bose

Bhuvaneshwari at Puvaneshwari Vs Mohan

K.Padma Vs Nil

S.K.Leathers Private Limited Vs Sathya Murthy

S.Anuradha Vs S.Saravanan

A.Gayathri Vs M.Arivazhagan