K.Padma v. Nil
Case brief
What is this about?
1402 & 1403 of 2020 T.RAJA, J. This matter…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.A. Nos.1396, 1402 & 1403 of 2020
T.RAJA, J.
This matter is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant.
2.Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there has been a
typographical error crept in paragraph 9 of the order dated 15.10.2020
wherein it has been stated as '2160 sq.ft.' instead of '2610 sq.ft. Since the extent of the petition mentioned property is 2610 sq.ft. and the same could
be seen from the Schedule of Property which is enclosed at page No.38 of
the typed set of papers filed by the appellant, learned counsel for the
appellant requested this Court to rectify the same.
3.A perusal of the above schedule of property would show that the Layout LPDM/DTP. No.48 of 1972 is measuring to an extent of 2610 sq.ft.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
Coram
T. Raja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court