Yessagnanam Arketti v. K.Sudha
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition under Section 11 challenging wilful disobedience of a W.P. order is closed by the Court after the respondent counsel submitted that the petitioner was granted promotion and the order would be served.
What did the court decide?
the petition is closed upon confirmation of compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.345 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Cont.P.No.345 of 2020
Mr.Yessagnanam Arketti
.. Petitioner
Versus
Thiru.K.Sudha
Block Development Officer,
Soolagiri,
Krishnagiri District.
.. Respondent
Prayer:- Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for committing contempt of court by wilfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.18996 of 2019, dated 04.12.2019.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Dakshayani Reddy
For Respondent : Mrs.V.Annalakshmi, GA
ORDER
This petition has been filed to punish the respondent for committing
contempt of court by wilfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.18996
of 2019, dated 04.12.2019.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition challenges wilful disobedience of a judgment regarding pension/grant of promotion.
Whether the order in the underlying W.P. is reportedly complied with before the contempt petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. Yessagnanam Arketti
- respondent
Thiru. K. Sudha
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court