Disposed

D.S.Stalin, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC10 Sept 2020WP/4523/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to conduct a survey and issue a patta for specified land. The court disposed of the petition because the respondent reported that the survey was already conducted, corrections recommended, and relief effectively granted during the petition's pendency.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as the relief claimed was already granted by the respondent.

D.S.Stalin, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 10.09.2020 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶4

W.P.No.4523 of 2020

¶5

D.S.Stalin, S/o.C.Dayanandan. ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, South Chennai Division, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2.The Thasildar, Sholinganallur Taluk Office, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to pass an order in favour of the petitioner pertaining to uploading and updating the online patta in favour of the petitioner herein pertaining to property situated at Sholinganallur Taluk, Madipakkam Madura Puzhuthivakkam Village, Patta No.5254, comprised in Survey No.29/7C2 Part, Sapthagiri, Nagar, Plot No.8B, measuring an extent of 1039 sq.ft and pass orders.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ramachandran For Respondents: Mr.Annai Ezhil, Government Advocate.

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to conduct a survey and to make the necessary corrections in the revenue records and issue patta in favour of the petitioner.

¶11

2.During the pendency of the writ petition, it was reported that the application submitted by the petitioner has been taken on file and a date has been fixed for survey of the property. On such representation, the matter was adjourned and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ it is posted for hearing today.

¶12

3.The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents ciruclated the proceedings of the first respondent dated 08.09.2020, wherein the first respondent has stated that the survey has already been conducted and necessary recommendation has been made to the District Collector to carry out the correction in the revenue records.

¶13

4.This Court also had an opportunity to go through the entire proceedings circulated through email.

¶14

5.In view of the above development, the relief as claimed by the petitioner has already been granted and accordingly this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶15

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rm
To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
South Chennai Division,
Guindy,
Chennai-600 032.
2.The Thasildar,
Sholinganallur Taluk Office,
Sholinganallur,
Chennai 600 119.

¶16

W.P.No.4523 of 2020

¶17

A.SK(16/10/2020)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.S.Stalin, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.S.Stalin, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Anantharaman Vs The Chennai Metropolitan

K.Rathinasamy, Vs The District Superintendent of Police

A.Rani Vs The District Collector

Mgr Educational and Research Institute, Vs Union of India

Mgr Educational and Research Institute, Vs Union of India

C.Praveenkumar (Reg. No.810117251018) Vs The Registrar