Disposed

C.H. Manohar v. K.Shanmugam IAS

Madras HC10 Nov 2020CONT P/233/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition filed to punish respondents for non-compliance of a court order, the court closed the proceedings after learning that this matter has been stayed pending a Special Leave Petition filed by the petitioner, while granting liberty to approach the court later.

What did the court decide?

This contempt petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the court if necessity arises.

C.H. Manohar Vs K.Shanmugam IAS — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Cont P No 233 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.11.2020

¶4

Coram

¶5

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶7

Cont P No 233 of 2015
C.H.Manohar ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.Thiru K.Shanmugam I.A.S.,
Principal Secretary to Government,
Finance (T&A II) Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai -09.
2.Thiru C.Muninathan I.A.S.,
Director of Treauries and Accounts,
Panagal Building, Saidapet,
Chennai - 15 ... Respondents

¶8

Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

¶9

to punish the respondents for the willful disobeying the orders of this Court

¶10

dated 27.06.2014 passed in W.A.No. 441 of 2014.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Page 1 of 3

¶13

Cont P No 233 of 2015

¶14

For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai,
Addl. Govt. Pleader
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J .]
Alleging that the order of this Court dated 27.06.2014 passed in
W.A.No. 441 of 2014 has not been complied with, the present contempt
petition has been filed.
2.There is no representation for the petitioner./party-in-person.
3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Additional
Government Pleader submitted that a Special Leave Petition in SLP (C)
No.5475 of 2015 has been filed, wherein this contempt proceedings have
been stayed.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Page 2 of 3

¶17

Cont P No 233 of 2015

¶18

4.In view of the above, this contempt petition stands closed.

¶19

However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach this Court, if

¶20

necessity arises.

¶21

SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
mmi/ssm
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of
the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SMI/11/01/2021
To
1.The Principal Secretary to Government,
Finance (T&A II) Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai -09.
2.The Director of Treauries and Accounts,
Panagal Building, Saidapet,
Chennai - 15

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

Page 3 of 3

C.H. Manohar v. K.Shanmugam IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.H. Manohar v. K.Shanmugam IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanchaiah Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by

Selvaraj Vs State Rep by

T.C.Veerappan Vs State Represented by

K,Gnanamoorthy Vs the Superintendent of Police

Venda Vs the State of Tamilnadu

R.Brindadevi Vs Syed Babu