R.Brindadevi v. Syed Babu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish respondents for disobeying earlier orders were closed due to the subsequent acquittal of the detenu.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petitions closed
What the court decided
Cont P Nos 1195 & 1196 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.11.2020
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Cont P Nos. 1195 & 1196 of 2012
R.Brindadevi ... Petitioner
in both cases
-vs-
Syed Babu
Inspector of Police,
Anuparpalayam Pudur PS,
Tiruppur District. ... Respondent
in Cont P No.1195/12
Asra Garg
Superintendent of Police,
District Police Office,
Tiruppur. ... Respondent
in Cont P No.1196/12
Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
to punish the respondent for the willful disobeying the orders of this Court dated 10.07.2012 in H.C.P.No.1371 of 2012 and M.P. No.1 of 2012 in HCP No.1371 of 2012.
Page 1 of 3
Cont P Nos 1195 & 1196 of 2012
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sundaravadanom (in both) For Respondent :Mr.R.Prathap Kumar (in both) Addl. Public Prosecutor
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Brindadevi
- respondent
Syed Babu
- respondent
Asra Garg
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court