S.D.Madasamy v. Thiru Harmander Singh I.A.S
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed a contempt petition filed against government officials for failing to implement an order granting promotion and seniority benefits. The Court directed the respondents to settle all monetary benefits and dues within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
The respondents are directed to settle monetary benefits with all dues within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order.
What the court decided
Cont. P. No.1714 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Cont. P. No.1714 of 2019 in
W.A.No.134 of 2015
S.D.Madasamy, S/o.Dhanushkodi, No.7, Indira Ninaivu Kudiyiruppu Colony, Melakarisalkulam, Sivagiri Taluk, Rayagiri Post 627 764, Tirunelveli District. ... Petitioner
Vs
1.Harmander Singh, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Rural Development (Special Panchayat) Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition filed for disobedience of order regarding promotion and seniority is maintainable and warrants any punishment.
Whether the respondents were required to settle monetary benefits along with dues within eight weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.D.Madasamy
- respondent
Harmander Singh
- respondent
S.Palanisamy
- respondent
Shilpa Prabakar Sathish
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court