Disposed
Mr.Vijay Kumar Maheswari v. the Income Tax Officer
Madras HCCMP/3452/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
3454 of 2020 C.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of 2020
C.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of 2020
in T.C.A.Nos.SR53386, SR53394 & SR53395 of 2019
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.)
These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 277 days in
representing the above appeals.
2.Heard the parties. This Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the respective affidavits filed in support of the respective petitions to condone the delay of 277 days in representing the above appeals and accordingly, these petitions are ordered.
(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 21.02.2020
ay
1/3
C.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of 2020
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.
and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
ay
C.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of 2020
in
T.C.A.Nos.SR53386, SR53394 & SR53395 of 2019
2/3
C.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of 2020
Dated:21.02.2020
3/3
N.KIRUBAKARAN
P.VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court