A.Chakravarthi v. v.C.Rameswaramurugan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner sought punishment for willful disobedience of a previous order. The respondent Government Advocate submitted that the order had been complied with, providing proof. The court closed the petition based on this submission without granting any further relief or punishment.
What did the court decide?
None
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1218 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
CONT.P.No.1218 of 2019
A.Chakravarthi,
S/o.Appavu,
No.459, Gajalakshmi Street,
Gandhi Nagar,
Vellore 6. .. Petitioner
Vs .
1.Dr.V.C.Rameswaranmurugan
The Director of School Education,
D.P.I.Complex, Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 6.
2.P.Punniyakotti,
The Chief Educational Officer,
Vellore.
3.Dr.M.Rajamanickam,
The District Education Officer,
Thirupattur. .. Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.17765 of 2011 dated 08.08.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.U.Karunakaran For Respondent : Mr.P.Raja Government Advocate
1/3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves punishment for willful disobedience of the order in W.P.No.17765 of 2011 dated 08.08.2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Chakravarthi
- respondent
Dr. V. C. Rameswaranmurugan
- respondent
P. Punniyakotti
- respondent
Dr. M. Rajamanickam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court