Chinniah v. Manickam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Order XLI Rule 19 CPC. Having condoned the delay and verified compliance with prior conditions regarding a cost payment, the Court restored the Second Appeal to the file.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is restored to file.
What the court decided
CMP(MD). No.6742 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Nineteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty PRESENT
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ CMP(MD). No.6742 of 2019 in SA(MD).No.668 of 2009
Chinniah ...Petitioner/Appellant
Vs
- 1 Manickam (Deceased Sole Respondent)
- 2 Chandra
3 Amutha
- 4 Jeya
5 Vijaya ...Respondents 2 to 5/LR's of the deceased sole respondent
Prayer in CMP(MD). No.6742 of 2019 :-
Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XLI Rule 19 of Code of Civil Procedure, praying this Court to set aside the order of dismissal dated 26.08.2014 made in S.A(MD)No.668 of 2009.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Order XLI Rule 19 CPC and restore the second appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chinniah
- respondent
Manickam (Deceased)
- respondent
Chandra
- respondent
Amutha
- respondent
Jeya
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court