Chinniah, v. Manickam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition before Madras High Court to condone a 1743-day delay in representing a petition to set aside the dismissal of a Second Appeal. Court condoned delay subject to payment of ₹5,000 towards the Women Lawyer's Association creche.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 1743 days is condoned subject to payment of ₹5,000 towards the Women Lawyer's Association Creche.
What the court decided
CMP(MD) No.6071 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Sixteenth day of October Two Thousand and Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ
CMP(MD) No.6071 of 2019 IN SA(MD) No.668 of 2009
CHINNIAH ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
Vs
1 MANICKAM
(DECEASED SOLE RESPONDENT)
2 CHANDRA
3 AMUTHA
4 JEYA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 1743 days in filing the present petition to set aside the order of dismissal in Second Appeal No.668 of 2009 can be condoned.
Whether the petitioner who filed an identical petition in September 2014 should suffer for the fault of counsel filing a fresh petition in 2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
CHINNIAH
- respondent
MANICKAM
- respondent
CHANDRA
- respondent
AMUTHA
- respondent
JEYA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court