Chellam v. Gurusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a second appeal abated due to the death of the sole appellant, Chellam, during the hearing.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
S.A(MD).No. 884 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.10.2020 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ S.A(MD).No. 884 of 2011 and CMP(MD).No.4335 of 2020
Chellam
Vs.
1.Gurusamy 2.Manguthai 3.Latcham Theavar : Respondents / Defendants
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC of the Land Acquisition Act, against the confirming the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.72 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Usilampatti (CAMP), dated 25.02.2010 filed against the Judgment and decree in O.S.No.19 of 1998 on the file of District Munsif, Usilampatti, dated 20.02.2001.
For appellant : No appearance For respondents : Mr. R. G. Shankar Ganesh
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the sole appellant viz., Chellam died. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chellam
- respondent
Gurusamy
- respondent
Manguthai
- respondent
Latcham Theavar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court