Allowed

V.P.Alagarsamy(Died) v. the Special Tahsildar (La)

Madras HC10 Nov 2020AS(MD)/130/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act. The Court modified the Tribunal's award by enhancing the market value from 260% to 360% and directed the respondent to deposit the enhanced compensation within three months.

What did the court decide?

Award enhanced from 260% to 360% market value; respondent directed to deposit balance compensation within three months.

V.P.Alagarsamy(Died) Vs the Special Tahsildar (La) — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶2

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

AS(MD)No.130 of 2017

¶7

V.P.ALAGARSAMY(DIED) 1. A.VENKATRAMAN

¶8

A.tHANGARAJ A.MURUGAN (DIED)

¶9

LAKSHMI

¶10

JEYARAMAN

¶11

R.VIMALA

¶12

SARANYA

¶13

KUMUTHA PRIYA ... Appellants/Claimants

¶14

/ VERSUS /

¶15

1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), (LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER), KARUR-DINDIGUL BROADCAUGE, RAILWAY LINE, UNIT NO.III, DINDIGUL. ... 1^st Respondent/ 1^st Respondent

¶16

2 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(CONSTRUCTION),

¶17

SOUTHERN RAILWAY, MADURAI-10. ... 2^nd Respondent/Beneficiary

¶18

Appeal Suit filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act. Praying this Court to call for the records pertains to the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2015 made in L.A.O.P.No. 8 of 1991 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul and to set aside the same.

¶19

DECREE : This Appeal Suit coming upon for hearing on this day, upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal, judgment and decree of the Court below and the material papers of the Appeal and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.A.Shahjahan, Advocate for the Appellants and of Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Additional Government Pleader on behalf of the Respondents and of Mr.A.Haja Mohideen, Advocate for the 2^nd Respondent, this Court while allowing the Appeal and in modification of award of Tribunal below doth order and decree as follows ;

¶20

That,the award passed by the Tribunal, dated 27.02.2015 made in L.A.O.P.No. 8 of 1991 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul be and hereby is enhanced the market value from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Rs.260/- percent to a sum of Rs.360/- percent for the acquired land;

¶21

2.That in all other aspects the award of the Tribunal below do stand;

¶22

3.That the second respondent herein/Beneficiary be and hereby is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, as awarded herein less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment; and

¶23

That, there be no costs in this Appeal Suit.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

¶29

1.The Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul.

¶30

2.The Special Tahsildar (LA), (Land Acquisition Officer) Karur – Dindigul Broadcauge, Railway Line, Unit No.III, Dindigul.

¶31

3.The Executive Engineer (Construction), Southern Railway, Madurai – 10.

¶32

The Section Officer, (2 copies) VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.A.Shahjahan, Advocate Sr.No.21829 +1cc to SPL GP Sr.No. 21888

¶34

ORDER DATED : 10/11/2020 ========================= DECREE ==========================

¶35

AS(MD)No.130 of 2017

¶36

NATURE OF DECREE : Allowing the Appeal preferred against the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2015 made in L.A.O.P.No. 8 of 1991 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul and etc. as stated within.

¶37

VB (22.01.2021) 3P 8C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.P.Alagarsamy(Died) v. the Special Tahsildar (La)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.P.Alagarsamy(Died) v. the Special Tahsildar (La)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sowthun Begum Vs K. Mohammed Ali

Lakshmana Pillai (Died)(2) Sundaram (Died) (3) Thiruvu Konar, Vs Alangaravel

Usha Vs Manohar

Mani, Vs Ponnusami Pillai

Kamatchi Vs The Inspector of Police

Rinihappuchjeyarenjini Vs John Naveenraj