The court modified an earlier order in W.A.Nos. 509, 445, and 501 of 2020. It held that impleadment applications filed by petitioners were not disposed of, as the earlier order was erroneous. The court allowed the applications to formally implead the applicants as parties.
C.M.P.Nos. 7416, 7417, 7853 of 2020 and 7419 of 2020 allowed to admit applicants as parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.9574 of 2020 in W.A.No.445 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.09.2020
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
C.M.P.No.9574 of 2020
in W.A.No.445 of 2020
1.J.Kalaiselvan
2.M.Dinesh Kumar
3.N.Aravindan
4.S.Easwaramoorthy
5.V.Gopi
6.M.Dhinesh Kumar
7.S.Vasudevan
8.P.Balu
9.D.Arun
10.B.Kokila
11.S.Rajasekar
12.C.Ramesh
13.E.Pooveandan ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.R.Venkatagiri
2.A.Sait Abdul Kareem
3.M.Govan Dhas
4.E.Sathyamoorthi
5.S.Vinish
6.A.Raja Mohamed
7.N.Venkatraman
8.M.Jayakarishna
___________ Page 1 of 5_
C.M.P.No.9574 of 2020 in W.A.No.445 of 2020
9.B.Prasanna Raja 10.S.Lakshmanan 11.J.Ravisakar 12.N.Vaithi 13.N.Sasikumar 14.S.Abdul Munaf 15.D.Gautham 16.R.Manoh Prabahar
17.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Secretary to Government, Transport Department, St. George Fort, Chennai – 600 009.
18.The Controller of Examinations, The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
19.The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
20.The Transport Commissioner, The Transport Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed to modify the judgment of this Court passed in W.A.Nos.509, 445 and 501 of 2020 by allowing the impleading petition namely C.M.P.No.7416 of 2020 in W.A.No.445 of 2020 filed by the petitioners.
___________ Page 2 of 5_
C.M.P.No.9574 of 2020 in W.A.No.445 of 2020
For Petitioners
: Mr.N.Subramaniyan
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard learned counsel for the applicants. 2. It has been pointed out that while disposing of the appeals on 18.8.2020, the impleadment applications filed by the applicants had already been numbered and therefore, they ought to have been formally impleaded in the array of parties.
___________ Page 3 of 5_
C.M.P.No.9574 of 2020 in W.A.No.445 of 2020
C.M.P.No.7419 of 2020 in W.A.No.501 of 2020 for impleadment stand allowed and they shall be treated as parties in these proceedings.
The application is, accordingly, allowed. Registry is directed to
carry out necessary amendment in the judgment and issue a fresh
copy of judgment to the parties.
(A.P.S., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
10.09.2020
bbr
Page 4 of 5
C.M.P.No.9574 of 2020 in W.A.No.445 of 2020
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
bbr
C.M.P.No.9574 of 2020
in W.A.No.445 of 2020
10.09.2020
___________ Page 5 of 5_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the earlier order disposing of impleadment applications at the summary remedy stage must be modified to formally admit the applicants as parties.
J. Kalaiselvan and others
State of Tamil Nadu and others
A.P. Sahi
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
