The court allowed the special leave petition, condoning the delay due to sufficient cause shown. The appeal was treated as filed within time and assigned a regular number. The judgment was delivered by the Chief Justice and Mr. Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy.
The delay was condoned; the special leave petition was allowed and the appeal was given a regular number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.6726 of 2020 in W.A.No.SR 158801 of 2019
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
Having heard learned counsel
for the petitioner/appellant, we find
sufficient cause having been shown
for condoning the delay. Accordingly,
the delay is condoned and the petition
is allowed.
The appeal shall be treated to
be within time and be given the
regular number.
(A.P.S., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
09.09.2020
sra
3 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause was shown for condoning the delay in filing the special leave petition.
What was the court's ruling regarding the time limit of the appeal.
Whether the special leave petition should be allowed and assigned a regular number.
Appellant/Petitioner
Other Respondent
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
