Allowed

The Special Tahsildar v. Moorthi Rao

Madras HC20 Jul 2020CMP/7615/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Learned Single Judge of Madras High Court considered two Civil Miscellaneous Petitions filed under Order 4 Rule 9(4) CPC by respondents in Land Acquisition matters seeking condonation of delay (298 days) in representing Appeal Suits. The court accepted the reasons provided in affidavits and condoned the delay, allowing the suits to proceed. (Search relevance low, judgment is a procedural order sol

What did the court decide?

The delay of 298 days was condoned and the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions were ordered accordingly.

The Special Tahsildar Vs Moorthi Rao — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 20.07.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

C.M.P.Nos.7615 & 7616 of 2020 in
Appeal Suit (SR) Nos.29482 & 29483 of 2019
The Special Tahsildar
Land Acquisition Officer
Tirupattur
... Petitioners in both C.M.P.
& Appellants in A.S.
Vs
Moorthi Rao ... Respondent in
C.M.P.No.7615 of 2020
Krishna Moorthy ... Respondent in
C.M.P.No.7616 of 2020
Prayer in C.M.P.No.7615 of 2020:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under
Order 4 Rule 9(4) code of Civil Procedure to condone the delay of 298 days
representing the above ASSR.No.29482 of 2019 against the order passed in
LAOP.No.704 of 2013 dated 26.11.2015 on the file of the Special Subordinate
Court, Vellore.

¶6

Prayer in C.M.P.No.7616 of 2020:- CivilMiscellaneous Petition filed under Order 4 Rule 9(4) code of Civil Procedure to condone the delay of 298 days representing the above ASSR.No.29483 of 2019 against the order passed in

¶7

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶8

LAOP.No.702 of 2013 dated 26.11.2015 on the file of the Special Subordinate Court, Vellore.

¶9

Prayer in Appeal Suit SR.No.29482 of 2019:- Appeal Suit filed Under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition to set aside the judgment and decree in LAOP No.704 of 2013 dated 26.11.2015 on the file of the Special Subordinate Court, Vellore.

¶10

Prayer in Appeal Suit SR.No.29483 of 2019:- Appeal Suit filed Under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition to set aside the judgment and decree in LAOP No.702 of 2013 dated 26.11.2015 on the file of the Special Subordinate Court, Vellore.

¶11

For Petitioners / Appellants : Mr. J.Balagopal, Spl.GP. O R D E R These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed by the

¶12

petitioner / Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Officer, Tirupattur, seeking to condone the delay of 298 days in representing the above Appeal Suits.

¶13

Heard the learned Special Government Pleader (AS) appearing for the appellant.

¶14

Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support

¶15

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶16

of the above petitions and being satisfied with the same, the delay in representing these Appeals is condoned and these CMPs are ordered accordingly.

¶17

20.07.2020
srk

¶18

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶19

R.MAHADEVAN, J,

¶20

srk

¶21

C.M.P.Nos.7615 & 7616 of 2020 in
A.S.(SR) Nos.29482 & 29483 of 2019
20.07.2020

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

The Special Tahsildar v. Moorthi Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Special Tahsildar v. Moorthi Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Shivakrishna Finance Vs N.Shanmugham

A.N.S. Rajasekarann Vs A.N.S. Appadurai

Parvathy Vs Periyanagi @Neela

Murugan Vs Ranjithkumar

R.Kamaraj Vs R.Alagesan

Kaanthammal Vs National Ins.Co.Ltd., Bhavani