P.Hari Prasad v. G.Duraisamy
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Civil…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of August Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CMP No.6585 of 2018
IN AS.NO.287 OF 2018
P.HARI PRASAD [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 G.DURAISAMY [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 S.SHARMILA
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents defendants his men agents and servants or any other person acting on behalf of the respondent not to alienate the schedule mentioned property which is the subject matter in OS.No.331/2018 (in CMP.No.6585/2018) pending disposal of the AS.No.287/2018.
(Xerox Copy attached in Schedule of Property)
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.FRANKLIN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SUKUMARAN on behalf of the 1st Respondent the court made the following order:-
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition for ad-interim injunction should remain pending after a long delay without any interim order being passed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. HARI PRASAD
- respondent
G. DURAI SAMY
- respondent
S. SHARMILA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court