Marappan v. Palanathal
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought a stay on a final decree from a lower court. The High Court, after hearing arguments, dismissed the stay prayer regarding the order of 09/09/2016 and made that interim order absolute, thereby disposing of the petition.
What did the court decide?
The interim order granted on 09/09/2016 is made absolute regarding the stay against passing the final decree.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of August Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CMP No.14517 of 2016
IN AS.NO.572 OF 2016
1.MARAPPAN [PETITIONERS]
2.NANDHAKUMAR
3.ANBARASAN
4.VIJAYA JOTHI
5.TAMIL SELVAN
6.JEYAJOTHI
7.SARASWATHI
8.A.SUBRAMANIAN
9.A.SENTHILKUMAR
Vs
PALANATHAL [ RESPONDENT ]
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Stay the Judgment and Decree dated 30/10/2013 and made in O.S.No.518 of 2012 on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Court Coimbatore (in CMP.No.14517/2016) pending disposal of the above in AS.No.572/2016.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.N.DAMODARAN, Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.V.ANANDHAMOORTHY Advocate on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-
ORDER
In this petition, interim order of stay against passing of final decree alone, has been granted on 09.09.2016 and the matter has been kept pending till this date.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order of stay against passing of a final decree should be made absolute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Marappan and Others
- respondent
Palanathal
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court