P. Eswaramoorthy v. Kumudhan
Case brief
What is this about?
This order in a civil miscellaneous petition converted a previously granted interim stay on a final decree into an absolute stay.
What did the court decide?
Intermediate stay granted in CMP No.5061 of 2016 made absolute.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Seventh day of August Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
CMP No.5061 of 2016
IN AS.NO.286 OF 2016
1 P. ESWARAMOORTHY [ PETITIONERS ]
2 E. PALANIAMMAL
Vs
1 KUMUDHAN.M [ RESPONDENTS ]
W/O. ARJUNAN, BOTH ARE RESIDING ATNO.80
VELAANKATTUVALASU POST, THUYYAM POONDURAI
VILLAGE, ERODE TK AND DIST.
2 MINOR DEEPIKA MINOR REP BY HER,
NEXT FRIEND MOTHER KUMUDHAM.
3 ARJUNAN
4 SELLAMMAL
S/O. LATE NACHIMUTHU GOUNDER, RESPTS 3 AND 4
RESIDING AT SUNKAN THOTTAM, ODAANILAI,
ARACHALUR VILLAGE, ERODE TK AND DIST.
5 MALLEESWARI
W/O. PALANISAMY, ICHIKATTUVALASU,
PALAYAKOTTAI VILLAGE, KUTTAPALAYAM POST,
KANGAYAM TK, ERODE DIST.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay the operation of the Judgement and decree dated 08/10/2015 passed in OS.No.18/2014 by the I Additional District Court, Erode, (IN CMP.NO.5061 OF 2016) pending disposal of the above IN AS.NO.286 OF 2016.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.KAITHAMALAI KUMARAN, ADVOCATE FOR 1 & 2 RESPONDENTS AND 3 TO 5 Respondent not appearing either in person or by an advocate AND Petitioner not appearing either in person or by an advocate the court made the following order:-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. ESWARAMOORTHY
- petitioner
E. PALANIAMMAL
- respondent
KUMUDHAN.M
- respondent
DEEPIKA
- respondent
ARJUNAN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court