Interim injunction application filed to restrain respondents from alienating suit property. Petitioner did not appear; respondent counsel was present. Court made the interim injunction absolute and disposed of the miscellaneous petition accordingly.
The interim injunction in CMP.No.14102 of 2019 is made absolute and the petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twentieth day of August Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
CMP.No.14102 of 2019
IN AS.No.502 of 2019
R.MUTHUSELVAM [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 V.MAHALAKSHMI [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 V.MURALIDHARAN,
3 V.SASIKALA
4 R.SELVARAJ
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order of Interim injunction restraining the Respondents from alienating the suit property in pursuance of the Judgment and Decree dated 29/03/2019 made in OS.No.28/2018 passed by III rd Additional District Judge, Thirupattur , (IN CMP.No.14102 of 2019) pending disposal of the above Appeal (AS.No.502 of 2019).
Order : This petition coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.M.VIJAY KUMAR, Advocate for the respondents and the petitioner not appearing either in person or by an Advocate, the court made the following order:-
There is no representation for the petitioner/appellant. The learned counsel for the respondents is present.
-sd/-
20/08/2020
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. )
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
THE 3RD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,
TIRUPATTUR.
C.C. to MR.A.PARTHASARATHY Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
Order
in
CMP.No.14102 of 2019
IN AS.No.502 of 2019
Date :20/08/2020
From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the Interim Orders in this format
UM(04/09/2020)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim injunction granted in CMP.No.14102 of 2019 should be made absolute given the petitioner's non-appearance.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
R. MUTHUSELVAM
V. MAHALAKSHMI
V. MURALIDHARAN
V. SASIKALA
R. SELVARAJ
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
R. MAHADEVAN
Parties & counsel
