B.Ramalingiah v. J.Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for stay of proceedings refused as petitioner failed to deposit the conditioned 20% compensation amount within the stipulated deadline. Interim stay automatically vacated per prior order.
What did the court decide?
Stay on proceedings refused; interim stay of original decree vacated due to non-compliance with deposit condition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the First day of September Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CMP NO.13586 OF 2019
IN AS.NO. 484 OF 2019
B.RAMALINGIAH [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 J.RANI [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 J. EMALDA
3 MINOR J ROOSEVELT
S/O.LATE JAYAPRAKASH,
MINOR REP BY MOTHER
AND NEXT FRIEND J.RANI,
4 MINOR J.STALINA
D/O. LATE JAYAPRAKASH,
MINOR REP BY MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND J.RANI
5 M. BALIAH ABRAHAM
6 JEBATHANGAM
7 CHENNAI CORPORATION
REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
RIPPON BUILDINGS, CHENNAI,
P.S. BALAKRISHNAN (DECEASED).
8 B. SIVAKUMAR
9 B. SIVAGURU
B. NATARAJAN (DECEASED).
10 KASTHOORI
11 SHAMUNDEESWARI
12 KALAVATHY
13 N. SENTHIL KUMAR
14 N. ARUN KUMAR
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Judgement and decree dated 05-02-2019 made in OS.No.12050/2010 on the file of the V Addl.Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai (in CMP.No.13586/19) pending disposal of the above AS.No.484/19.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.RAMALINGIAH
- respondent
J.RANI
- respondent
J. EMALDA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court