The court condoned the statutory delay of 62 days in filing a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. The notice to the first respondent was dispensed with due to their ex parte presence, while the second respondent raised no serious objection.
Ordinogram to condone delay of 62 days; appellate proceedings to be initiated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.13279 of 2020
in
C.M.A.SR.No. 84143 of 2020
V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to
condone the delay of 62 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal.
respondent is dispensed with.
respondent and she has not raised any serious objection in allowing the
above petition to condone the delay.
with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the
delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the petition is ordered. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in
order and also directed to print the name of Mrs.C.Bhuvanasundari, learned counsel appearing for 2nd respondent in the cause list.
21.12.2020
rpp
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 62 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
Petitioner
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
V.BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
