register was marked. Considering the fact that he was working as a Power Loom Weaver, which was not disputed, he would easily get a sum of Rs.500/- per day and even assuming that he was working for 24 days per month, he will definitely get a sum of Rs.12,000/- per month. However, the Tribunal, without considering the same, has fixed the monthly income of deceased as Rs.10,000/- on the ground that there is no attendance register was marked. In the said circumstances, the monthly income of deceased is fixed as Rs.12,000/-. Considering the age of deceased as 37 years, 40% should be added as a future prospects, and there are four claimants, 1/4th of monthly income is necessarily to be deducted towards his personal expenses. Hence, the notional monthly income of deceased is arrived at Rs.12,600/- and applying the multiplier of 15, the loss of dependency comes to Rs.22,68,000/-. In respect of other heads, as sum of Rs.80,000/- was granted towards filial consortium, and for one minor child, he is entitled for a sum of Rs.40,000/towards parental consortium as per the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd., vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur and others, reported in 2020 (2) TNMAC 1. Towards filial consortium, father and mother of deceased are entitled for a sum of Rs.40,000/- each. So far as other heads are concerned, the Tribunal has awarded a just and fair compensation. Hence, there is no need to interfere with the same.
