Ravi v. the Competent Authority
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 24.11.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
CMA.No.3421 of 2009
Ravi ... Appellant
-vs-
1.The Competent Authority and ... Respondents
District Revenue Officer,
Collector Office, Cuddalore.
2.Sai Balaji Finance and Investment,
No.4, South Street,
Chidambaram, Cuddalore District,
represented Guardian.
3.T.Chandrasekaran
4.Venkataraman
Appeal filed under Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Protection
of Interest of Depositors (In Establishment) Act 1997 against
the order dated 20.10.2009 on the file of the Special Judge
T.N.P.I.D. Act Chennai in O.A. No.26 of 2005.
For Appellant : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 23.11.2020, there was no representation for the appellant and therefore, the same was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today no one appeared on behalf of the appellant when the matter is of the year 2009. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, M.P. No.1 of 2009 is closed. No costs.
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ravi
- respondent
The Competent Authority and District Revenue Officer, Collector Office, Cuddalore
- respondent
Sai Balaji Finance and Investment, No.4, South Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, represented Guardian
- respondent
T. Chandrasekaran
- respondent
Venkataraman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court