Dismissed

The Special Tahsildar v. P.Subramani

Madras HC2 Dec 2020AS(MD)/620/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Special Leave Petition under Sec. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act challenged the award in L.A.O.P. No. 41 of 1988. The High Court dismissed a change of law argument noting the matter was settled by a prior order and consequently confirmed the lower court's award.

What did the court decide?

The award and decree of the Land Acquisition Tribunal dated 26.04.2004 are confirmed; no costs awarded.

The Special Tahsildar Vs P.Subramani — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

A.S.(MD). No.620 of 2011

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Wednesday, the Second day of December Two Thousand and Twenty PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ A.S.(MD). No.620 of 2011

¶3

The Special Tahsildar Land Acquisition Chettinaickanpatti Scheme Dindigul . ...Appellant / Referring Officer

¶4

Vs P.Subramani, S/o.T.M.Perumalpillai, Chettinaickenpatti, Chettinaickenpatti Village, Dindigul Taluk. ...Respondent / Claimant

¶5

Prayer :- This Appeal Suit filed under Sec. 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the award and decree Dated 26/04/2004, passed in L.A.O.P. No. 41 of 1988 on the file of the Court of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal / Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.

¶6

ORDER:- This Appeal coming up for hearing on this day and upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the award of the Tribunal and the material papers relating to this case and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. J. Gunaseelan Muthiah, Additional Government Pleader for the Appellant and of Mr.P.Athimoolapandian, Advocate for the respondent, this Court having observed that there is nothing more to adjudicate upon the matter, which has already been settled and has reached finality, and while disposing of the Appeal Suit in terms of the order passed by this Court in The Special Tahsildar(LA), Chettinaickanpatti Scheme, Dindigul Vs. M. Suruttaian and others, reported in 2002(4) LW 121, doth order and decree as follows:

¶7

That the award and decree Dated 26/04/2004, passed in L.A.O.P. No. 41 of 1988 on the file of the Court of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal / Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul be and hereby are confirmed; and

¶8

That there be no costs in this Appeal Suit.

¶9

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶10

// True Copy //

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

1/2

¶13

A.S.(MD). No.620 of 2011

¶14

¶15

The Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.

¶16

Copy to:

¶17

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.(2 copies)

¶18

ORDER DATED 02.12.2020

¶19

DECREE

¶20

A.S No.620 of 2011

¶21

Disposing of the Appeal Suit filed against the award Dated 26.04.2004, passed in L.A.O.P. No. 41 of 1988 on the file of the Court of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal / Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul etc., as stated within.

¶22

bk(CO) TR(08.02.2021) 2P 4C

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

2/2

The Special Tahsildar v. P.Subramani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Special Tahsildar v. P.Subramani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Spl. Tahsildar (La) Vs Ponnuthai

P.Kasirajan Vs Kesavan

The Deputy Chief Engineer, Vs Soliammal (Died)

The Special Tahsildar Vs Rajarathinam

The Special Tahsildar Vs v.Alagumalai

The Special Tahsildar Vs P.Ponnuchamy