Allowed

The Special Tahsildar v. P.Ponnuchamy

Madras HC2 Dec 2020AS(MD)/619/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act against an award and decree dated 26/04/2004. The Court observed the matter was already settled and reached finality. The appellate court confirmed the lower tribunal's award and decree without modification.

What did the court decide?

The award and decree dated 26/04/2004 passed in L.A.O.P. No. 40 of 1988 were confirmed; no costs awarded.

The Special Tahsildar Vs P.Ponnuchamy — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

A.S.(MD). No.619 of 2011

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶4

Wednesday, the Second day of December Two Thousand and Twenty

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ

¶7

A.S.(MD). No.619 of 2011

¶8

The Special Tahsildar Land Acquisition Chettinaickanpatti Scheme Dindigul . ...Appellant / Referring Officer Vs

¶9

P.Ponnuchamy, S/o.late Perumalpillai,

¶10

P.Nallupillai, S/o.late Perumalpillai,

¶11

P.Ramasamy, S/o.late Perumalpillai,

¶12

P.Suburamani, S/o.late Perumalpillai, all at Chettinaickenpatty, Chettinaickenpatti Village and Post, Dindigul Taluk. ...Respondents/Claimants

¶13

Prayer :-

¶14

This Appeal Suit filed under Sec. 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the award and decree Dated 26/04/2004, passed in L.A.O.P. No. 40 of 1988 on the file of the Court of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal / Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.

¶15

ORDER:-

¶16

This Appeal coming up for hearing on this day and upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the award of the Tribunal and the material papers relating to this case and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. J. Gunaseelan Muthiah, Additional Government Pleader for the Appellant and of Mr. P. Athimoolapandian, Advocate for the respondents, this Court having observed that there is nothing more to adjudicate upon the matter, which has already been settled and has reached finality and while disposing of the Appeal Suit in terms of the order passed by this Court in The Special Tahsildar (LA), Chettinaickanpatti Scheme, Dindigul Vs. M. Suruttaian and others, reported in 2002(4) LW 121, doth order and decree as follows:

¶17

1.That the award and decree Dated 26/04/2004, passed in L.A.O.P. No. 40 of 1988 on the file of the Court of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal / Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul be and hereby are confirmed; and

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

A.S.(MD). No.619 of 2011

¶21

2.That there be no costs in this Appeal Suit.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

The Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul. Copy to:

¶28

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai(2 copies).

¶29

ORDER DATED 02.12.2020

¶30

DECREE

¶31

A.S No.619 of 2011

¶32

Disposing of the Appeal Suit filed against the award Dated 26.04.2004, passed in L.A.O.P. No. 40 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal / Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul etc., as stated within.

¶33

PK(CO) TR(08.02.2021) 2P 4C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

The Special Tahsildar v. P.Ponnuchamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Special Tahsildar v. P.Ponnuchamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Spl. Tahsildar (La) Vs Ponnuthai

P.Kasirajan Vs Kesavan

The Deputy Chief Engineer, Vs Soliammal (Died)

The Special Tahsildar Vs Rajarathinam

The Special Tahsildar Vs v.Alagumalai

The Special Tahsildar Vs P.Subramani