The Madurai Bench disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction to consider a representation regarding penalty on an approved construction. The court directed the first respondent to consider the matter on merits within eight weeks without adjudicating on the merits.
Direction to the first respondent to consider the representation on merits within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.04.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P.(MD)No.9562 of 2019
M.Jeya
... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner, Anna Maligai, Madurai Corporation, Tallakulam, Madurai-625 010.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Zone I, Madurai. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.12.2018 within a time that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam
For Respondents : Mr.M.Shamugaselvam
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
3.The first respondent is directed to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter. It is further reiterated that this Court has not given any positive direction to the first respondent to pass orders one way or the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ other.
2
Assistant Registrar
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )
+1 CC to M/s.N.SHANMUGA SELVAM, Advocate ( SR-61559[F] dated 22/04/2019 )
+1 CC to M/s.C.M.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-61705[F] dated 23/04/2019
W.P.(MD)No.9562 of 2019
CS:13/05/2019/2P/3C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Jeya
The Commissioner, Anna Maligai, Madurai Corporation
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
