Allowed

Suresh @ Sureshkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Apr 2019CRL OP(MD)/5764/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners accused of sections 294(b), 323, and 506(i) IPC. The court, noting the injured party's discharge and lack of guilt evidence, ordered their release on bail subject to specific conditions including police reporting and a monetary bond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners to be released upon arrest or appearance within fifteen days, subject to conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and reporting requirements.

Suresh @ Sureshkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Second day of April Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

CRL OP(MD) No.5764 of 2019

¶5

1 SURESH @ SURESHKUMAR 2 DEEPA 3 BALAGANESAN 4 HEMALATHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4

¶6

¶7

STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANDHIMARKET POLICE STATION, TRICHY. (CRIME NO.221/2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioners: Mr.G.KANDHA VADIVELAN, Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.S.CHANDRASEKAR, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners who are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b),323 and 506(i) of IPC r/w.Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Cr.No.221 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.It is the case of the prosecution that due to property dispute , the petitioners abused the defacto complainant, assaulted him and threatened him with dire consequences.

¶15

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they are innocent persons.

¶16

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that injured has already been discharged from the hospital and that investigation is pending.

¶17

5.Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that injured has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance,

¶18

¶19

within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Trichirapalli on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶20

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶21

(b)the first and third petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m until further orders and the second and fourth petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

¶22

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶23

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶24

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶25

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/-

22/04/2019

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶30

Madurai - 625 023.

¶31

¶32

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, TRICHIRAPALLI. 2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶33

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANDHIMARKET POLICE STATION, TRICHY. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to MR.G.KANDHA VADIVELAN Advocate SR.No.7127

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

CRL OP(MD) No.5764 of 2019

¶36

MS/MMS/SAR-4/26.04.2019/2P.6C

Suresh @ Sureshkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh @ Sureshkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shibu, S/O.Sathiya Seelan Nair Vs the Inspector of Police

Sisters of Cross Society for Vs the Secretary to Govt

B.Chellapandi, S/O.Backiyaraj Vs the Sub Registrar

M.Jeya Vs the Commissioner

K.Alphonse Gomaz, Vs the District Registrar

Arunkumar Vs the Inspector General of