Disposed

R.Tamlvendhan, S/O.Rayappan, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC12 Nov 2019WP(MD)/2894/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking removal of encroachments on lands in Melur Taluk. The court directed the petitioner to remove encroachments on a channel and the 6th respondent to remove a shed and wire fence within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Order directing the petitioner to remove encroachment on the channel and the 6th respondent to remove the asbestos shed and wire fence within six weeks.

R.Tamlvendhan, S/O.Rayappan, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.2894 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.11.2019 CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI

¶5

W.P.(MD) No.2894 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.2180 of 2019

R.Tamilvendan

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶10

2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner, Land Survey and Settlement (Survey), Chennai – 600 005.

¶11

3.The Regional Deputy Director, Survey and Land Records, Madurai – 625 020. 4.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶12

5.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Melur, Madurai District.

¶13

6.P.Periya Karuppan ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment made in the Vandi Pathai situated in S.No.316/2 and in the Kalam situated in Survey Nos.317/1A, 317/1C1 and in the Poochikulam Kanmai situated in Survey No.320 in Salakkippatti Village, Thumbaipatti Union in Melur Taluk, Madurai District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/3

¶16

W.P.(MD) No.2894 of 2019

¶17

For 6

¶18

For petitioner : Mr.Vasanthakumaresan For Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, Special Government Pleader For 6^th Respondent : Mr.M.Ramu

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

¶21

Heard Mr.V.Santhakumaresan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 and Mr.M.Ramu, learned counsel appearing for the 6^th respondent.

¶22

2.The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment made in the Vandi Pathai situated in S.No.316/2 and in the Kalam situated in Survey Nos.317/1A, 317/1C1 and in the Poochikulam Kanmai situated in Survey No.320 in Salakkippatti Village, Thumbaipatti Union in Melur Taluk, Madurai District.

¶23

3.When the Writ Petition was heard earlier, the Hon'ble Division Bench by order dated 22.07.2019, appointed an Advocate Commissioner to cause inspection of the lands in S.Nos.316/1, 317/1A, 317/1C1 and 320 in Salakkipatti Village, Thumbaipatti Union, Melur Taluk and file a report.

¶24

4.The learned Advocate Commissioner has filed a report, which shows that the petitioner himself has encroached certain portion of the channel and the 6^th respondent has put up Asbestos Sheeted Shed and Steel wire fence. Since, these are objectionable and illegal, both the parties should remove the same.

¶25

5.Accordingly, we dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the Block Development Officer, Karunkalagudi to take appropriate steps to ensure that the petitioner removes the encroachment and restores the channel and the 6^th respondent removes the Asbestos sheeted shed and wire fence. If there is any encroachment in the area, the same shall be removed and if there is any defacement of water channel, the same shall be restored. This direction shall be complied with within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/3

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.2894 of 2019

¶32

¶33

1.The Chief Secretary, State of Tamilnadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner, Land Survey and Settlement (Survey), Chennai – 600 005.

¶34

3.The Regional Deputy Director, Survey and Land Records, Madurai – 625 020.

¶35

4.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai, Madurai District. 5.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Melur, Madurai District.

¶36

+1 CC to M/s.V.SANTHAKUMARESAN, Advocate ( SR-97794[F] dated 13/11/2019 )

¶37

+1 CC to M/s.M. RAMU, Advocate ( SR-97852[F] dated 13/11/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-98072[F] dated 13/11/2019 )

¶38

W.P.(MD) No.2894 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.2180 of 2019 12.11.2019

¶39

JMN(15.11.2019) 3P : 9C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

3/3

R.Tamlvendhan, S/O.Rayappan, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Tamlvendhan, S/O.Rayappan, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cumbum Kottaiyachutri Veedugal Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep. by Its

Latha, Vs R.P.Karuppannan

V.Manikandeswarakumaran, Vs the District Collector

P.Praveenkumar Vs The District Collector

T.Muneeshwari Vs the Management of Tamil Nadu State

P.Victor Vs The Commandant