Latha, v. R.P.Karuppannan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 CPC because the appellant filed a memo stating she was no longer pressing the appeal due to a settlement reached between the parties.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. The memo filed by the appellant forms part of the order. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
A.S.(MD)No.108 / 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI
A.S.(MD)No.108 of 2019
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.5606 of 2019
Latha
... Appellant/Respondent/ Plaintiff
Vs.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code should be allowed when the appellant has filed a memo stating she is no longer pressing the appeal due to a settlement.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Latha
- respondent
R.P.Karuppannan
- respondent
K.Mohanraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court