Petitioner sought restitution of RTI records via writ petition. Information Commission had already furnished the sought data before the hearing, resulting in the petition being closed without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.02.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
WP(MD)No.2880 of 2019
P.Velammal
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in SA 2116/A/2018 dated 12.12.2018 as illegal, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to remit back and conduct fresh inquiry in SA 2116/A/2018 before the second respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah For Respondents : Mr.K.K.Senthil for R1 Mr.Karuppasamy for R2
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side. The information sought for by the writ petitioner has since been furnished to the writ petitioner. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. It stands closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (T&P)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
Chennai – 600 018.
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-48137[F] dated 19/02/2019 )
+1 CC to M/s.K.K.SENTHIL, Advocate ( SR-47966[F] dated 19/02/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.J.SENTHIL KUMARAIAH, Advocate (SR-48705[F] dated 21/02/2019)
SKM
DS : 27/03/2019 : 2P/6C
WP(MD)No.2880 of 2019 18.02.2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Velammal
The Tamil Nadu State Information Commission
The District Collector
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
