Disposed

P.Raakayee v. the Thasildar

Madras HC6 Nov 2019WP(MD)/22473/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a narrow scope agreed by counsel, the Madurai Bench directed the Thasildhar to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2019 regarding property measurement within eight weeks, ensuring third-party notice if necessary, and to communicate the disposal within seven days. The Court expressed no opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation within 8 weeks, communicate disposal within 7 days, and provide notice to third parties if affected; Court passed no order on merits.

P.Raakayee Vs the Thasildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.22473 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2019 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P(MD)No.22473 of 2019

¶4

P.Raakayee ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

1.The Thasildhar, Taluk Office Melur, Madurai District.

¶7

2.The Surveyor, Taluk Office Melur, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2019 and to measure the property in SR.No.39/4-B Revenue Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District for the purpose of demarcating the property as regards its areas and extents.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu, Additional Government Pleader.

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Mr.A.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr.K.Mu.Muthu, learned Additional Government Pleader on behalf of both respondents are before this Court.

¶12

With consent of learned counsel on both sides, main writ petition is taken up, heard out and is being disposed of.

¶13

3. The main writ petition turns on a very narrow compass, as it is one seeking mandamus qua disposal of writ petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2019 wherein writ petitioner has sought measurement, survey / fixing of boundaries or in other words localize the land which according to writ petitioner belongs to her.

¶14

4. Notwithstanding several averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, notwithstanding several grounds raised / contentions urged in the affidavit filed in support of instant writ petition, learned counsel for writ petitioner abridges the scope of the writ petition and submits that it will suffice if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/3

¶16

W.P(MD)No.22473 of 2019

¶17

aforementioned representation of the writ petitioner, dated 10.09.2019, details of which have been alluded to supra.

¶18

5. Learned State counsel submitted that the first respondent is the authority who shall consider the aforementioned representation dated 10.09.2019 made by the writ petitioner (page No.13 of the typed set of papers forming part of the case file).

¶19

6. The aforesaid representation dated 10.09.2019 shall be disposed of by the first respondent on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

7. It is made clear that in the course of the representation being considered by the first respondent, if the rights of any other third party / parties or any other third party entity / entities is / are likely to be affected, the first respondent shall give reasonable opportunity to such third party / parties or any other third party entity / entities, before disposing of the aforementioned writ petitioner's representation. Though obvious, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion or view on the merits of the matter. The authority concerned shall not embark upon any exercise which is within the domain of civil Court jurisdiction.

¶21

8. The proceeding / order of disposal shall be communicated by the office of the first respondent to the writ petitioner and others concerned (if any) under due acknowledgement within seven (7) working days from the completion of aforesaid exercise.

¶22

9. Instant Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶24

¶25

The Thasildhar, Taluk Office Melur, Madurai District.

¶26

The Surveyor, Taluk Office Melur,

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai District.

¶28

2/3

¶29

W.P(MD)No.22473 of 2019

¶30

+1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-96682[F] dated 07/11/2019 ) +1 CC to Mr.A.SENTHILKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-96608[F] dated 07/11/2019 )

¶31

W.P(MD)No.22473 of 2019

¶32

06.11.2019

¶33

ps MK (14.11.2019) 3P 5C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

3/3

P.Raakayee v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Raakayee v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.R.Ramesh, Vs the Superintendent

R. Shanmugham, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

K.Abdul Rahman Vs the Regional Passport Officer

M/S.Kodai Valley Orchards Vs the Tahsildar

P.Keerthiga Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Senthur Pandian Nadar Vs J.Mani