Senthur Pandian Nadar v. J.Mani
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court examined a contempt petition filed for the violation of an earlier order restraining interference with property. The Court recorded that the petitioners had filed a complaint with the police and that the previous order dated 23.07.2018 was being complied with, consequently closing the instant contempt petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
The instant Contempt Petition is closed and no costs awarded.
What the court decided
Cont.P(MD)No.1601 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR Cont.P(MD)No.1601 of 2019
in
C.M.P(MD)No.5436 of 2018 in
S.A.No.1619 of 2000
1.Senthur Pandian Nadar
2.P.Subramania Nadar
3.P.Palavesamuthu Nadar
P.Shanmugavel Nadar (died) Esakkiammal (died)
4.T.Mookkammal (died)
5.T.Selvam
- 6.Thamaraikani
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the no-contempt petition should be sealed on account of compliance with the previous order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.Senthur Pandian Nadar
- petitioner
2.P.Subramania Nadar
- petitioner
3.P.Palavesamuthu Nadar
- petitioner
4.T.Mookkammal
- petitioner
5.T.Selvam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court