Dismissed

Kamalam @ Kamalam Mokkapandy v. the District Collector

Madras HC22 Oct 2019WP(MD)/22266/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to issue a house site patta for Government Prombokku land. The petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition while preserving her rights to send fresh representations to the court.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition preserving the petitioner's right to send fresh representations.

Kamalam @ Kamalam Mokkapandy Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.22266 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.10.2019

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P.(MD)No.22266 of 2019

¶5

Kamalam @ Kamalam Mokkapandy

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

/Vs./

¶8

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶9

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶10

3.The Tahsildar,

¶11

Nagamalai Pudukkottai, Madurai District. ... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to issue free house site patta to the petitioner in Survey No.70 which is Natham Government Prombokku land situated at Thattanur Village, Madurai District.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu Additional Government Pleader

¶14

ORDER

¶15

After some arguments, learned counsel for writ petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition, but made a plea that the rights of writ petitioner to send fresh representation for herself alone may please be preserved.

¶16

2.Permitted to withdraw.

¶17

3.Though obvious it is made clear that rights if any of other individuals who have sent representations along with writ petitioner and who are not before this Court will remain intact and will not be affected by this Court.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn albeit

¶19

1/2

¶20

W.P.(MD)No.22266 of 2019

¶21

preserving the rights of the writ petitioner in the aforesaid manner. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar (AD II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmk To 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Nagamalai Pudukkottai, Madurai District. +1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-94044[F] dated 23/10/2019 ) Order made in W.P.(MD)No.22266 of 2019 22.10.2019 KM/(07.11.2019) 2P 5C

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

2/2

Kamalam @ Kamalam Mokkapandy v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamalam @ Kamalam Mokkapandy v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramathal, Vs the Zonal Deputy Thasildar

G.Saravanan, Vs Additional Chief Secretary

K. Surandhran Vs the Principal Secretary

S.Raju Vs the District Collector

M. Arockiyadoss Vs the District Collector

Bazeer Vs the District Revenue Officer